When interpreting words or construing provisions in an Act of Parliament, the context in which the words appear and the purpose of the Act can be used to ascertain meaning. The catchcry of text, context and purpose has become a repeated moniker for the High Court of Australia’s µmodern approach’ to statutory interpretation.  In this context, the thought of removing either text, context or purpose as a primary factor to be considered when divining meaning seems unfathomable.
Please access a pdf of the full article using the link to the left.
(2017) 40(3) UNSWLJ 952: https://doi.org/10.53637/MHZW7665