Back to Publication

General / Thematic: The Individual Judge

Women Judges, Private Lives: (In)visibilities in Fact and Fiction


Margaret Thornton and Heather Roberts

Throughout the Western intellectual tradition, the separation of public and private life has been ubiquitous.[1] Although the line of demarcation changes according to time and circumstance, the conjunction of the public sphere with the masculine and the private sphere with the feminine has remained a constant in political thought.

Please access a pdf of the full article using the link to the left.

(2017) 40(2) UNSWLJ 761:

  1. See, eg, Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar (eds), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy (University of Chicago Press, 1997); Margaret Thornton (ed), Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates (Oxford University Press, 1995); Ruth Gavison, ‘Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction’ (1992) 45 Stanford Law Review 1; S I Benn and G F Gaus (eds), Public and Private in Social Life (Croom Helm, 1983); Frances E Olsen, ‘The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform’ (1983) 96 Harvard Law Review 1497.